Vilius Gaubas vs Diego Dedura Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Recent Second Serve Performance: Gaubas has been marginally stronger, winning 45.68% of second serve points compared to Dedura's 43.68%. Could this edge be significant in determining the match outcome?
• Return Game Proficiency: Dedura slightly excels in return games. On an opponent's second serve, Dedura wins 46.92% of points, just edging Gaubas who wins 46.43%.
• First Serve Return Stats: Dedura again holds a minor advantage with a 30.7% success rate, compared to Gaubas at 30.23%.
• Under Pressure Performance: Gaubas shines under pressure, saving 51.59% of breakpoints, significantly more than Dedura's 43.01%. Could resilience be the key?
• Overall Match Win Rate: Over the past year, Dedura wins more frequently at 57.33% of matches, while Gaubas has a win rate of 52.78%.
• Surface Strengths: Both players excel on clay, yet Gaubas holds a minor advantage with a 63% win rate over Dedura's 59%.
• Event Level and Match Wins: Gaubas competes mostly at higher-tier tournaments with a 54% win rate, while Dedura outshines at lower-tier events, boasting a 66.67% win rate.
• Opponent Quality: Recently, Gaubas has faced tougher competition, as indicated by an average opponent rank of 239.29 compared to Dedura's 304.67.
• Deciding Sets: If the encounter goes the distance, Gaubas is more dependable, winning 47% of deciding sets, whereas Dedura manages only 37%.
• Breakpoint Conversion: Both players convert breakpoints at a similar efficiency, with slight advantage to Dedura at 37.63% compared to Gaubas at 37.55%.

Editorial Prediction (August 4, 2025, UTC):

Evaluating second serve effectiveness, Gaubas shows a slight advantage, suggesting they may gain crucial points in extended rallies.

In return games, while Dedura marginally surpasses Gaubas on both first and second serve returns, the differences are minimal.

Gaubas's exceptional ability to handle pressure situations, evidenced by superior breakpoint saving stats, could be decisive during key moments.

With Dedura having a higher match win rate over the past year but generally competing at a lower tournament level, Gaubas potentially holds an edge due to experience against stronger opponents.

Both players excel on clay, yet Gaubas's consistently better performance on this surface might play a pivotal role.

If the match reaches a deciding set, Gaubas seems better equipped to clinch the crucial moments based on recent form.

While Dedura has shown high efficiency in winning at a competitive level, Gaubas presents as the more resilient and strategically rounded player, potentially giving them the upper hand in this match.

Based on these insights, Gaubas is likely to emerge victorious in the upcoming tennis match.